Saturday, July 13, 2013

Obasanjo to lead election observers to Zimbabwe

Obasanjo to lead election observers to Zimbabwe

HARARE (AFP) – Former Nigerian president Olusegun Obasanjo will lead a team of 60 African Union monitors to Zimbabwe for the July 31 election, the organisation said Friday.
Obasanjo will arrive in Zimbabwe 10 days before the vote, which has already been overshadowed by allegations of political intimidation and electoral rolls packed with “ghost voters”.
Obasanjo
Obasanjo
In a statement, the AU said the monitors — drawn from African NGOs and member countries — will work with nine observers already on the ground.
Obasanjo has twice ruled Nigeria.
A former soldier, he headed a military government between 1976 and 1979 and served an eight-year term as an elected president between May 1999 and May 2007.
President Robert Mugabe has opposed the entry of non-African observers to monitor the election, which will see the long-term leader try to extend his 33-year term.
Rights groups have expressed concern that the vote will see a repeat of vote rigging and violence that has marred previous polls.
Amnesty International on Friday called on regional bodies to “meticulously document human rights violations, in particular those committed by government agencies”.
Zimbabwe’s security forces, controlled by President Robert Mugabe, 89, have in the past been accused of rights abuses and intimidating political opponents.
At least 200 people were killed in the run-up to the June 2008 presidential run-off between Mugabe and his arch rival Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai.
Tsvangirai will again be Mugabe’s opponent on July.

Mandela’s wife says now ‘less anxious’ about his health

Mandela’s wife says now ‘less anxious’ about his health

JOHANNESBURG (AFP) – Graca Machel, the wife of ailing South African icon Nelson Mandela, said she was less anxious about his condition Friday, five weeks after he was admitted to hospital.
“He continues to respond positively to treatment. I would say that today I’m less anxious than I was a week ago,” she told state-backed SABC television.
It is the latest in a series of upbeat accounts, which seem to suggest that while the 94-year-old’s condition remains “critical”, it has improved somewhat.
Nelson Mandela
Nelson Mandela
After visiting Mandela late Thursday, President Jacob Zuma said he was “responding to treatment.”
“He remains as much of a fighter now as he was 50 years ago,” Zuma said, marking the anniversary of a police raid that led to Mandela’s life sentence in prison.
Earlier in the week Buyelekhaya Dalindyebo, who is one of Mandela’s nephews and king of his Thembu tribe, said the former statesman was “conscious”.
“He could not talk, but he recognised me and made a few gestures of acknowledgement, like moving his eyes.”
Two weeks ago the prognosis appeared much bleaker, with family massing at his Pretoria hospital as Zuma abruptly cancelled a trip to Mozambique.
Doctors are said to have ruled out switching off Mandela’s life support machines unless there is serious organ failure.
Court documents filed on behalf of the family last month described Mandela’s condition as “perilous”, with one claiming he was in a “vegetative state”.
Mandela, who turns 95 next week, was rushed to a Pretoria hospital on June 8 with a recurring lung infection.
Share    Print       Email

Several dead, dozens injured in France train derailment

Several dead, dozens injured in France train derailment

PARIS (AFP) – At least seven people were dead and dozens injured on Friday after a speeding train split in two and derailed at a station in the southern suburbs of Paris, officials said.
Interior Minister Manuel Valls gave the initial toll of seven dead and said there also were “dozens of injured” following the accident at the Bretigny-sur-Orge station involving a train heading from Paris to the west-central city of Limoges.
The minister said that information on the number of dead and wounded was “constantly evolving” and that several train carriages were lying on their sides.
The Paris prefect’s office said a “red alert” plan had been activated at 5:23 pm (1523 GMT) following the accident.
“The train arrived at the station at high speed. It split in two for an unknown reason. Part of the train continued to roll while the other was left on its side on the platform,” a police source told AFP.
The cause of the accident was not immediately known.
“It was not a collision and it was not a problem with the speed,” a source with the SNCF national rail service told AFP.
The accident took place at 5:14 pm, the SNCF said, minutes after the “Intercite” train left the Paris-Austerlitz station.
Bretigny Mayor Bernard Decaux told newspaper Le Parisien that there was chaos at the station.
“Everyone is running in every direction, there is panic,” he said. “It is an apocalyptic scene. We are trying to organise things.”
Dozens of emergency and police vehicles had arrived at the scene, an AFP reporter said.
The accident occurred as many in France were departing for the start of their summer holidays
Share    Print       Email

British counter-terror police probe mosque ‘nail-bomb’

British counter-terror police probe mosque ‘nail-bomb’


LONDON (AFP) – British counter-terror police were on Friday investigating reports of an explosion outside a mosque in central England that witnesses said left nails scattered over the ground.
No injuries were reported after the incident in the town of Tipton in the West Midlands, but police evacuated several streets in the area as a precautionary measure.
“An investigation is being led by the West Midlands Counter Terrorism Unit and it is being treated as a terrorist incident,” West Midlands Police said in a statement.
There has been a rise in anti-Muslim incidents in Britain since May, when a soldier was hacked to death on a London street in a suspected Islamist attack.
Friday’s incident coincided with the funeral of 25-year-old soldier Lee Rigby, who was murdered in broad daylight near his barracks in Woolwich, southeast London, on May 22.
Prime Minister David Cameron was among 800 mourners at Rigby’s private military funeral in Bury, northwest England, while thousands of members of the public lined the streets to pay their respects.
Two Muslim converts from Nigerian Christian families have been charged with Rigby’s murder and are due to stand trial in November.
Share    Print       Email

Vatican: Pope tightens penalties for child abuse

Vatican: Pope tightens penalties for child abuse

   
 

Pope Francis
Pope Francis on Thursday announced a reform of the Vatican penal code, introducing tighter penalties for child abuse, financial crimes and official leaks, while abolishing life sentences. The move comes in the wake of: paedophilia scandals that rocked the Catholic Church in recent years; allegations of wrongdoing at its bank, the Institute of Religious Works;… [Read More...]

N130m alleged fraud: Former Deputy Governor of Lagos State asks court to stop arrest

N130m alleged fraud: Former Deputy Governor of Lagos State asks court to stop arrest


By Bartholomew Madukwe
Former Deputy Governor of Lagos State, Alhaja Sinatu Aderoju Ojikutu, has filed a suit asking the Lagos High Court to stop the Inspector General of Police, IGP, from arresting her.
Ojikutu, 67, and her son, Adebisi Ojikutu (Jnr), were both declared wanted by the Special Fraud Unit, SFU,  of the Nigeria Police Force. The police said that the former Deputy Governor had a case involving a fraud of N130 million to answer.
She  however, said the matter  which culminated into the police investigation was a civil case involving the sale of her late husband’s land at Lekki, Lagos.
Ojikutu said she sold the  land through her  lawyer, Chief Bolaji Ayorinde, SAN, to one Mr  Cajetan Okekearu, adding that both of them (herself and Adebisi jnr) obtained their letter of administration at the Probate Registry of the Lagos High Court.
ojikutu
*Aderoju Ojikutu
The police had alleged that the former Deputy Governor and her son allegedly conspired and sold a parcel of land known as Plot 24, Block 4 situated at Admiralty Way, Lekki Phase 1, Lagos for N130 million to Okekearu.
But Ojikutu’s Counsel, Pedro asked the court to declare that the said land described in the contract of sale dated October 6, 2011 and entered into by his client and the third defendant (Okekearu), belonged to her late husband, Mr Sampson Adebisi Ojikutu, pointing out that they were  the true beneficiaries of his estate by virtue of the Letters of Administration with reference No. PHC/2114/2010.
She then urged the court to declare that the IGP, Mohammed Dahiru Abubakar,  and the Second defendant, the Commissioner of Police- SFU,  Tunde Ogunsakin, were not empowered under any known law to interfere with any civil matter arising out of a breach of contract in particular.
In the originating summons brought pursuant to Order 3 Rules 8 (1) and (2) of the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2012, the plaintiffs, among others, urged the court to determine whether the IGP and the Police Commissioner could legally, lawfully or validly convert the case into a criminal matter and proceed to declare the Ojikutu wanted or put her through any investigation whatsoever.
Furthermore, they then prayed the court to determine whether they were entitled to  the  said  land and whether  Okekearur, as a purchaser of the said land was under an obligation to make inquiries or investigate the  true ownership of the said property.
“Whether by virtue of clause 9 of the contract of sale dated October 6, 2011 entered into by the claimants and the 3rd defendant, the claimants are under obligations to indemnify the 3rd defendant in the event that the 3rd defendant incurred any expenses or loss arising from the transfer of title in the property as aforementioned. “Whether the refund of N50million by the claimants to the 3rd defendant was done in good faith and in compliance and partial fulfillment with clause 9 of the contract of sale dated October 6, 2011 and entered into between the claimants and the 3rd defendant,” Ojikutu stated. No date has yet been fixed for mention of the case.

Malala vows not to be silenced by terrorists

Malala vows not to be silenced by terrorists


NEW YORK CITY (AFP) – Pakistan teenager Malala Yousafzai vowed Friday not to be silenced by terrorists in a powerful speech to the United Nations on her first public appearance since being shot by the Taliban.
“They thought that the bullet would silence us, but they failed,” Malala said on her 16th birthday in a presentation in which she called for books and pens to be used as weapons.
“The terrorists thought that they would change my aims and stop my ambitions, but nothing changed in my life, except this: weakness, fear and hopelessness died. Strength, power and courage was born,” she said.
 Toorpekai  Yousafzai
Toorpekai Yousafzai, mother of Malala Yousafzai , the 16-year-old Pakistani advocate
Her 20 minute speech was given several standing ovations and was quickly hailed for her message of peace.
Malala, who wore a pink headscarf and a shawl that belonged to assassinated Pakistan leader Benazir Bhutto, insisted she did not want “personal revenge” against the Taliban gunman who shot her on a bus in Pakistan’s Swat Valley on October 12 last year.
“I want education for the sons and daughters of the Taliban and all the terrorists and extremists. I do not even hate the Talib who shot me. Even if there is a gun in my hand and he stands in front of me I would not shoot him.”
But Malala said “the extremists were and they are afraid of books and pens, the power of education. The power of education silenced them. They are afraid of women.”
“Let us pick up our books and pens. They are our most powerful weapons. One child, one teacher, one pen and one book can change the world. Education is the only solution,” she said.
The passionate advocate for girls education was shot in the head by a Taliban gunman as she road on a school bus near her home in Pakistan’s Swat Valley in October.
She was given life-saving treatment in Britain where she now lives, but the attack has given new life to her campaign for greater educational opportunities for girls.
Malala is now considered a leading contender for the Nobel Peace Prize. The Taliban have made it clear however that she remains a target.
Gordon Brown, the former British prime minister and UN special envoy for education, hailed Malala as “the bravest girl in the world” as he presented her at the UN Youth Assembly.
Brown said it was “a miracle” that Malala had recovered to be present at the meeting.
UN leader Ban Ki-moon and other top officials also hailed her achievements.
The speech in which Malala invoked the legacy of Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela and other legendary peace advocates brought quick praise.
Malala also thanked British doctors and nurses for the care they had given and the United Arab Emirates government for paying for her treatment.
“I cannot believe how much love people have shown me. I have received thousands of good wish cards and gifts from all over the world. Thank you to all of them. Thank you to the children whose innocent words encouraged me,” she said.
British Prime Minister David Cameron said on his twitter account that Malala had delivered a “powerful message”.
The United Nations estimates that 57 million children of primary school age do not get an education — half of them in countries at conflict like Syria.
“Students and teachers across our globe are intimidated and harassed, injured, raped, and even killed. Schools are burned, bombed, and destroyed,” said Diya Nijhowne, director of the Global Coalition to Protect Education from Attack.
Nijhowne highlighted a horrific attack in northern Nigeria last week.
Malala Yousafzai
Malala Yousafzai
Gunmen from the Boko Haram Islamist group — whose name literally means “Western education is a sin” — broke into a secondary boarding school and killed 41 students and one teacher before setting fire to the building.
According to Ban’s annual report on children and conflict, 115 schools were attacked last year in Mali, 321 in the occupied Palestinian territory, 167 in Afghanistan and 165 in Yemen.
Pakistan has an estimated five million children out of school and Nigeria 10 million, according to UN estimates.
Share    Print       Email

Allah’ll give my mum, dad justice –Kudirat’s son

Allah’ll give my mum, dad justice –Kudirat’s son

   


Major Hamza Al-Mustapha (arrowed) flanked by supporters, after he regained his freedom at the Appeal Court, in Lagos... on Friday. Right is the Late Kudirat Abiola.
First child of the late Kudirat Abiola, Lekan Abiola, has expressed disappointment over Friday’s Appeal Court judgment, which upturned the death sentence earlier passed on Major Hamza Al-Mustapha and Lateef Shofolahan, who were accused of masterminding the killing of his mother.
The Court of Appeal sitting in Lagos had earlier on Friday discharged and acquitted the former Chief Security Officer to the late Gen. Sani Abacha (Al-Mustapha) and Shofolahan, an ex-aide to the late Kudirat.
The appellate court had dismissed the judgment of Justice Mojisola Dada of the Lagos High Court, which sentenced both men to death by hanging, after accusing the judge of being “stroked to secure a conviction by all means.”
But the younger Abiola told Saturday PUNCH on Friday that he was “disappointed, but not particularly surprised by the judgement.”
“I pray that God will forgive my mother and I know that my mum and dad will definitely get justice; maybe not in Nigeria, but I’m sure that Allah will give them justice where they are.”
He said, “The Appeal Court only completed the work of other courts before it that have played roles in scuttling the family’s quest for justice in this matter. They finished the job, but they weren’t the ones who started it.
“We had seven or so defendants before now with confessions of the roles they played in the death of my mother; there was Mohammed Abacha, Banabas Jabila aka Sgt. Rogers, James Danbaba, Lateef Shofolahan, Rabo Lawal and others. Everybody said the role they played; the one who did the shooting; the one who drove; the one who arranged for the car that was used when they got to Lagos from Abuja; the people in the room when the order to kill my mother was given. All the seven started the case, but the Supreme Court started the whole thing when it said that Mohammed Abacha had no case to answer.”
According to him, the Abiola family would still have been disappointed even if the death sentence had been upheld by the Appeal Court.
He said, “One after the other, the cases were dropped and it was down to the remaining two. Where are the others? The fact that only two of them were convicted shows the rot in the judicial system. Even if the court had upheld the death sentence, we still wouldn’t have got the justice we sought. Already, most of those involved had been freed.”
Reacting to the assertion that military officers cannot be liable for crimes committed while carrying out orders from a superior officer, Abiola said military law also recognised illegality and had made provisions for such scenarios.
He argued that junior military officers get punished abroad for criminal offences carried out under direct order from a superior boss.
He said, “It has been proven that even in the military, you are not bound by law to obey an illegal order. If a human being asks you to do something, you have to ask yourself if it’s a legal order.
“After the World War II, German officials involved in war crimes, who claimed to be following orders before an international tribunal in Nuremberg, were found guilty and hanged.”
Abiola also expressed concern about the general situation in the country, saying that many Nigerians would be silently facing a fate similar to that being faced by his family.
He said, “Only God knows how many Nigerian family members have been killed by the police or the army and could not get justice. If something like that can happen to my family, what about other families that people don’t know anything about?
He, however, said that the Abiola family had accepted the judgment in good fate as Muslims, adding that some credits should go the “high court judge that passed the initial (death) sentence on Al-Mustapha and Shofolahan.”
Also, a younger brother to the late MKO Abiola, Alhaji Mubashiru Abiola, told one of our correspondents that the judgement came to the Abiola family as a “big surprise.”
Although he declined further comment on the judgment, Mubashiru said the family would issue a statement on the issue after a meeting of all members.
Similarly, Kudirat’s daughter, Hafsat Abiola-Costello, in a text message to one of our correspondents on Friday, said the family would not want to make any hasty comment on the appellate court’s decision.
Her text message read, “Hello, the family will release a statement in the next few days. Thanks.”
The judgment of the appellate court came about 14 years after the appellants were first arraigned in 1999, with two others, for the murder of Kudurat, wife of the winner of the June 12, 1993 presidential election, Chief MKO Abiola.
In the two separate but unanimous judgments delivered on Friday, the Justice Amina Augie-led appeal panel discharged and acquitted al-Mustapha and Shofolahan of the murder charges for lack of evidence.
Lack of evidence was the same reason the Supreme Court discharged and acquitted son of the late Head of State, Mohammed Abacha, from the same case on July 11, 2002.
The fourth person, Rabo Lawal, who was, during Abacha’s regime, the head of Mobile Police Force Unit in Aso Rock, was also discharged and acquitted from the case on July 14, 2011, by Justice Dada in her ruling on a no-case submission, which he (Lawal) filed after the prosecution closed its case.
The all-female appeal panel held that both the charges of murder and conspiracy to murder preferred against the two men by the Lagos State Government were unsubstantiated.
The two other justices on the panel were Rita Pemu, who read the lead judgment, and Fatima Augie.
Pemu described the lower court’s judgment as “worrisome,” adding that it was based on principles strange to the nation’s criminal justice system.
“The evidence of the prosecution was so unreliable that no responsible court will base the conviction of an accused person on,” she said.
She held that the two star witnesses of the prosecution (PW2 -Barnabas Jabila aka Sgt. Rogers and PW3, Mohammed Abdul aka Katako), having recanted their incriminating testimonies, the evidence given by them could no longer be relied upon.
“I wonder why the learned trial judge did not expunge the testimonies of PW2 and PW3,” Pemu said.
She said despite the evidence given by Jabila and Abdul, testifying that they were instructed to tell lies against the appellants, “the learned trial judge refused to concern her mind with the politics of the case. She allowed herself to be caught in the web of the conflict.”
Augie said in her supporting judgment, “The 326 pages cannot provide judgment where there is none.”
She said the judgment ought not to be too long “if the case of the prosecution was strong.”
According to Augie, the judgment being too long, the learned trial judge “strayed” into emotion and left the content of the matter while dwelling on the “shallow issues.”
She also wondered why the authorities “refused to prosecute Barnabas Jabila, who made a confession to have killed a person.”
On the testimony of the first prosecution witness, Dr. Ore Falomo, who was MKO Abiola’s personal physician, Pemu said the evidence given by him was immaterial, having only alleged that the bullet extracted from the head of the deceased was “uncommon one,” without any further proof.
Pemu said the bullet was never brought to court and that no ballistician report was tendered to corroborate Falomo’s claim that the bullet must have come from the Presidency and that Kudirat must have been killed by “a fifth columnist in government.”
“These questions are left unanswered by the prosecution,” Pemu said.
She said the incomplete testimony of the fourth prosecution witness (PW4), Ahmed Fari Yusuf, a retired Commissioner of Police, “goes to no issue” and as such, all the statements credited to the appellants, which were tendered through him, were all immaterial.
She said failure of the prosecution to present Yusuf for the defence to cross-examine after two trials-within-trial for 13 months to test the voluntariness of the statements “was an infraction to the rights of the appellants to fair hearing.”
As such, the court held that the three statements tendered as Exhibits A5, B1 and A6 had no “evidential value.”
The appellate court held that even if the appellants had actually committed the alleged crimes, nothing in the testimonies of all the four prosecution witnesses suggested so.
The court castigated the police for a “wishy-washy” investigation of the case, adding that the investigation of the Special Investigative Panel, set up on the case in 1999, was strange to the nation’s criminal justice system.
Pemu said, “PW2 and PW3 said that they were coerced to testify against the appellants and the incompleteness of the evidence of PW4 – all these leave so much to be desired.”
According to Pemu, the investigation conducted by the SIP on the case was a usurpation of the power of the police under sections 214 of the constitution as well as under the provisions of the Police Act.
She said, “The prosecution having failed to prove its case against the appellants, the appellants are entitled to being discharged and acquitted.
“Therefore the judgment of Justice Mojisola Dada of the Lagos High Court on January 30, 2012 is hereby set aside.
“The conviction and the sentence to death by hanging passed on Maj. Hamza Mustapha and Lateef Shofolahan for the murder of Alhaja Kudirat Abiola on June 4, 1996, is hereby set aside, and they are hereby discharged and acquitted.”
Shofolahan’s counsel, Mr. Olalekan Ojo, who led the defence team for both appellants at the lower court, said al-Mustapha and Shofolahan were victims of “a perverse judgment; luckless victims of politics of the South-West and luckless victims of politics at the top.”