Nyako, who spoke to State House Correspondents after meeting with President Goodluck Jonathan at the presidential villa, Abuja, is one of the five northern governors who had been touring the country to consult with past leaders and other stakeholders on the crisis rocking the NGF and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).
According to him, neither Amaechi nor Jang should step down for the other since the election was clearly won by the former. He described Jang as a yes man and a lackey who cannot be trusted to represent the interest of the governors.
The governor, who was meeting with the president alone for the first time since the crisis began, was apparently reacting to reports suggesting that they might have no choice except to step down as part of efforts to have peace.
Contending that Jang has nowhere to step down to since he only took second in the election, Nyako said, “In democracy when you have an issue you discuss. The election in the Governors’ Forum has become an issue. It shouldn’t be an issue. When you say 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, even someone who is in elementary school knows which is highest. If one group got 19 votes, the other one got 16, in democracy even in the eyes of the people in elementary school, they know that 19 is higher than 16. It should not be turned into a controversy. What could be related to that is that it could not be the figure. We could all agree that whoever got the higher figure won the election; but maybe beyond the figure, we have already in the Governors’ Forum established certain criteria for leadership within us. He must be somebody we trust. I would like to have a leader of the Forum who when he is with the president in the small room talking about Adamawa State can put in a good word for Adamawa State. It should not be someone who will aggravate issues in the eyes of Mr President. That element of trust must be there. If I vote for somebody it must be somebody I could trust.”
Noting that Jang lacked the clout of a leader to pilot the affairs of the NGF, Nyako said, “We also said it should be somebody who have some degree of chemistry with the president, that the president will be comfortable with. Now if we find that the president is not comfortable with him, how we can do a little bit of psychological work to get the two of them having the same chemistry?
“The other one we feel is that he should add some value to Mr President. If you have a Forum leader who is seen to be part of the president, that has become a yes man of Mr President, then, the governors would say he’s not representing our interests. If he is not representing the interest of the governors, he is not representing the interests of the ordinary Nigerians. These are areas we have sorted out. Obviously, if the chemistry is not still right, we should discuss it and find a way of adjusting the tempo, the countenance, the language of the subordinate.”
When asked to say who should step down between Amaechi and Jang in a situation where such decision becomes necessary, he said, “You are saying Jang should step down; step down for what? Did he
win the election?”
Admitting that the issue was deliberated upon in the meeting with former president Olusegun Obasanjo, the Adamawa governor said, “It was part of it, but you should understand the rationale. What we are saying here is that if he is going to step down because he is second winner, then, that is their business and it is not the business of others or the winner to tell you step down. He is number two; he got the second highest votes and that is the way forward. Step down for what? From number two to where? Number three or of four?”
PDP/NGF Crisis: Amaechi, Jang refuse to shift ground
The anticipated resolution of the lingering crisis in the ruling PDP appears to be an uphill task as the meeting called by former president Olusegun Obasanjo ended in a deadlock yesterday.
For three days, governors elected on the platform of the PDP and Obasanjo as well as President Goodluck Jonathan had been locked in a series of meetings aimed at ending the crisis in the party that has been heightened by the controversial election of the Nigeria Governors’ Forum (NGF), which led to the re-election of Rivers State governor Rotimi Amaechi with 19 votes as against 16 votes for Plateau State governor Jonah Jang.
But the refusal of governors loyal to President Jonathan to accept Amaechi as the NGF chairman while endorsing Jang as their chairman has polarised the NGF into two camps.
As of Tuesday, both Jang and Amaechi had been put under intense pressure to step aside for a neutral governor to take over the mantle of leadership at the NGF.
But the meeting convened by Obasanjo ended at about 3am on Wednesday without any meaningful progress in that regard.
A source at the meeting told LEADERSHIP last night that both Amaechi and Jang stood their grounds, insisting on their claims to the NGF chairmanship.
LEADERSHIP checks revealed that after the Monday night meeting, which dragged on to the early hours of Tuesday, reconvened, the tone of the governors changed from being reconciliatory.
The source, who sought anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the matter, said: “Honestly, the meeting did not end as much as we expected; it was a setback but we shall not rest until we see to the end of the crisis; we are all brothers and we cannot afford to fight for too long.
“My greatest surprise was that we had some tentative agreements before we adjourned to re-convene on Tuesday night, but the meeting became something else as one party reneged. So under such circumstances, there was nothing we could do than to also stick to ours.”
Before the Tuesday night meeting, LEADERSHIP learnt that the pro-Amaechi PDP governors had met at the Asokoro lodge of one of them where they reviewed the Monday night’s parley, its outcome and the likely implications for the group.
At the Asokoro meeting which preceded the Tuesday night session, they were said to have insisted that Obasanjo’s recognition of Amaechi was the only path to peace, a position they forcefully pushed at the re-convened meeting. Their argument was that Amaechi emerged through a democratically-conducted election and won with 19 votes as against Jang with 16 votes, insisting that 16 could not be greater than 19.
This, it was gathered, emboldened the pro-Jang governors to also insist that as the consensus candidate of the PDP, Jang remained their chairman.
As at press time, there were no indications that the peace parley would be re-scheduled to another date.
NASS, Not Presidency, Should Alter Revenue Formula – APC Govs
*Say NASS can’t legislate on local govt. autonomy
The All Progressives Governors’ Forum has advocated that the power to alter the revenue-sharing formula among the three tiers of government should reside with the National Assembly and not with the presidency.
Making the call in Lafia, the Nasarawa State capital, at the end of the maiden meeting of the Forum which held behind closed doors for over four hours, the spokesman of the Forum and Ekiti State governor Kayode Fayemi, said despite several recommendations made to the president for the review of the revenue-sharing formula, nothing has been done to address the issue.
Addressing the press, Fayemi said “the Forum deliberated on revenue allocation and notes that, in spite of recommendations made to the presidency, no effect has been given to the extant proposals on the need to give more funds to the states and local governments because that is where the citizens reside”.
Expressing the Forum’s desire for fair play in the allocation of resources since the presidency which is a direct beneficiary is also charged with the power to decide on the sharing formula which negates fair play, “the Progressive Governors Forum further recommended that the powers to alter the revenue allocation formula currently with the presidency should be vested in the National Assembly henceforth”.
At present, the revenue allocation formula is as follows: federal government (52%); states (26.72%); and 774 local government areas (20.60%).
But a committee raised by the Nigeria Governors’ Forum, in April this year, had recommended a drastic reduction in the federal government’s allocation.
The committee which was headed by the governor of Lagos State, Mr Babatunde Raji Fashola, had recommended this new formula: federal government (35%); states (42%); and local governments (23%).
Similarly, the Forum has called on the National Assembly to desist from making any further deliberation on issues that affect local government administration since it is within the purview of the State houses of Assembly to legislate on the matter.
The communiqué issued by the Progressive Governors’ Forum said: “The Forum discussed constitutional amendment extensively and resolved that the issue of local government administration, recognizing the fact that federalism is the basis of our sovereignty, is a matter within the purview of the federating unit and every attempt to legislate by the National Assembly on any aspect of local government administration will tilt the country towards a unitary state.” This, it added, “will undermine and weaken the fundamental principles of our federalism”.
In his contribution on the matter, Edo State governor Adams Oshiomhole said the real issue behind their call borders on the principle of federalism which stipulates that the federating states have the power of deciding how the local governments are administered.
He said, “Autonomy can be handled by states that believe in it, and you cannot impose one formula on a drug that cures all ailments. The fact of our diversity suggests that it is better to allow certain issues to be dealt with at the state level because some states may wish to give additional responsibility to the local governments and so the power to do that should not reside in Abuja.”
In his own comment, Lagos State governor Babatunde Fashola said the constitution guarantees a system of democratically elected local government leadership by laws made by the state houses of Assembly for the purposes of ensuring that the system works.
“Why should it therefore seek autonomy from an agency or institution that did not create it?” he asked. “A parent should decide whether their children can go out at night, not to ask their neighbour for permission to let their children go out at night.”
The Forum also commended the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for rising to the occasion in registering the APC in the overall national interest, adding that “the Forum hopes that such nationalistic and patriotic position of INEC shall continue to guide its conduct with respect to its statutory mandate”.
Pursuant to its firm resolve on respect for democratic norms and principles, the Progressive Governors’ Forum condemned the repression in Egypt which followed the overthrow of a democratically elected government and called on countries the world over to ensure speedy resolution of the crisis.
“The Forum condemns unreservedly the repression in Egypt following the unconstitutional ouster of a democratically elected government and calls on the international community to ensure speedy resolution of the crisis”. It also resolved not only to complement the efforts of the Interim National Executive of the APC but also to drive the process of consolidation through accommodation and tolerance in order to carry everybody along, since democracy is a game of numbers and compromise.
